MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2750783852

Spontaneous murine mammary tumours demonstrate a range of sensitivities to adoptively transferred T cells: defining the molecular and histological determinants of regression versus progression

2006· article· en· W2750783852 on OpenAlexaff
Erika M. Wall, Katy Milne, Michele L. Martin, Brad H. Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdoptive cell transferCD8BiologyEpitopeGenetically modified mouseImmune systemT cellCancerTransgeneCancer researchImmunologyPathologyAntigenMedicineGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 47, 2006 1164 To investigate T cell responses to spontaneous mammary tumours and define mechanisms of immune evasion, we developed a novel transgenic mouse model involving spontaneously arising, epitope-tagged mammary tumours. CD8+ and CD4+ T cell epitopes from ovalbumin were added to the C-terminus of the HER2/ neu oncogene to enable recognition by T cell receptor transgenic CD8+ (OT-I) and CD4+ (OT-II) T cells. C57Bl/6 transgenic mice expressing neu OTI/OTII in mammary epithelium together with a dominant-negative p53 transgene (DN p53 ) develop spontaneous mammary carcinomas at 6-10 months of age. T cell responses to these tumours were studied by adoptive transfer of naive OT-I and/or OT-II T cells into tumour-bearing mice. In mice that received OT-II cells, minimal or no T cell proliferation was observed in response to neu OTI/OTII-expressing tumours, even as late as 13 days post transfer. By contrast, OT-I T cells, infused alone or with OT-II T cells, proliferated vigorously within 3 days of adoptive transfer and subsequently infiltrated ∼75% of tumours by day 6 where they formed the major constituent (∼74%, n=8) of the CD8+ immune infiltrate. This resulted in complete regression of 19% (11/59) of tumours, with the remaining tumours showing partial regression (25%), stabilized growth (15%) or progressive disease (41%). Intriguingly, many non-regressing tumours continued to express neu OTI/OTII yet showed greatly reduced lymphocytic infiltrates at later time points (> day 11). Similarly, tumours generated from cell lines of progressive tumours failed to become infiltrated by OT-I or OT-II cells, suggesting they developed mechanisms to physically exclude T cells. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of CD8+ T cells eradicating established, spontaneously generated mammary tumours. We are currently investigating the mechanism(s) by which progressive tumours impair the infiltration and/or function of CD8+ T cells, and whether this can be reversed by combining adoptive T cell therapy with other treatments, such as chemotherapy, that disrupt tumour architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→