MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750932767 · doi:10.1101/181537

Functional effects of heating and cooling gene networks

2017· preprint· en· W2750932767 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel A. Charlebois, Kevin Hauser, Sylvia Marshall, Gábor Balázsi

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGene regulatory networkTetRGene expressionGeneRegulation of gene expressionNegative feedbackBiologyPositive feedbackElectronic circuitFunction (biology)BiophysicsRepressorComputational biologyCell biologyBiological systemGeneticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Everyday existence and survival of most organisms requires coping with temperature changes, which involves gene regulatory networks both as subjects and agents of cellular protection. Yet, how temperature affects gene network function remains unclear, partly because natural gene networks are complex and incompletely characterized. Here, we study how heating and cooling affect the function of single genes and well-characterized synthetic gene circuits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . We found nontrivial, nonmonotone temperature-dependent gene expression trends at non-growth-optimal temperatures. In addition, heating caused unusual bimodality in the negative-feedback gene circuit expression and shifts upward the bimodal regime for the positive feedback gene circuit. Mathematical models incorporating temperature-dependent growth rates and Arrhenius scaling of reaction rates captured the effects of cooling, but not those of heating. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that heating alters the conformational dynamics and allows DNA-binding of the TetR transcriptional repressor, fully explaining the experimental results for the negative-feedback gene circuit. Overall, we uncover how temperature shifts may corrupt gene networks, which may aid future designs of temperature-robust synthetic gene circuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207