HERMENEUTICS OF SUSTAINABILITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF BRAZILIAN FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainability has turned out to be a complex issue in the scope of Legal Sciences, in proportion as it directly impacts relationships in society, demanding constitutional interpretation from the perspective of subsidizing social conflicts. This imposes direct implications for these relations, such as the issues inherent in city planning. The aim of the present proposal is to promote the hermeneutic discussion of sustainability from the perspective of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, focused on the development of cities. The general objective is to hermeneutically interpret sustainability in the context of the Brazilian Constitution as a contribution to city planning; the specific objectives are (1) to address various forms of interpretation of the Federal Constitution; (2) indicate sustainability-orientating mechanisms for city planning in the Federal Constitution; and (3) to hermeneutically interpret sustainability for city planning according to the Federal Constitution. The task is based on Luhmann's Systems Theory, centered on the convergent social demands, considering that the order is to create a state of social tension exposed to normative demands; and also to keep the subsidiary support of the Constitution Theory discussed in Ommati (2016), in order to confirm an orderly and sustainable configuration of cities. We adopt the Content Analysis Method and the procedures required in the preparation of this task. As a result, a hermeneutic interpretation of sustainability for city planning is reached, using constitutional elements. This task contributes to academic knowledge and furthers the cause of the hermeneutics of sustainability in support of city planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".