MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

337. A DISEASE-SPECIFIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME FOR ANTI-NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY–ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS: SCALE STRUCTURE AND MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES OF THE ANTI-NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE

2017· article· en· W2751118429 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joanna Robson, Jill Dawson, Judy A. Shea, Helen Doll, Susan P. Ashdown, Renée Borchin, Ebony Easley, John T. Farrar, Don Gebhart, Katherine Kellom, Georgia Lanier, Raashid Luqmani, Carol A. McAlear, John R. Mills, Nataliya Milman, Jacqueline Peck, Gunnar Tómasson, Peter F. Cronholm, Peter A. Merkel

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVasculitisAnti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodyAntibodyPatient-reported outcomeImmunologyCytoplasmPathologyDiseaseQuality of life (healthcare)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is an organ- and life-threatening disease. Patients present with active disease, followed by periods of remission and flare, and have impairments in mental and physical wellbeing due to disease and treatment. An international team has developed a disease- specific patient-reported outcome measure: the AAV-PRO, supported by a steering group, including four patient partners, in collaboration with the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Vasculitis Working group. Candidate questionnaire items were produced following in-depth qualitative research in the UK, US, and Canada plus cognitive interviews, extensive piloting and independent linguistic and translatability assessment. Methods: Patients with AAV were recruited from Vasculitis UK, and the Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network. Patients completed the 35 candidate questionnaire items, plus information about their disease, at baseline and three months (included transition item charting change). Paper copies were used in the UK and an electronic online version in the US. UK patients also completed the Euro-Qol-5D (EQ-5D-5L). In the US, a test–retest exercise was completed 3–5 days following baseline. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Rasch analysis defined the underlying scale (domain) structure. The following properties were determined for each domain: convergent validity, using Pearson correlations between domain scores and the EQ-5D-5L; known groups validity, using t-tests to compare mean scores for different disease states; test–retest reliability, analysing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), with respondents reporting no change; and longitudinal construct validity, analysing mean change scores and effect sizes in relation to transition item responses at three months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207