Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extent to which labour and employment law form an autonomous subsystem within the legal order is a significant matter in labour relations scholarship. Human capability theory helps explain how open legal constructs for structuring personal work relations are emerging in a relatively autonomous manner. Similarly, concepts of relational rights and relational contract theory assist in understanding the relatively autonomous development of restorative labour market regulation, with both substantive and procedural dimensions. Moreover, dramatic changes in freedom of association doctrine under the Charter, which now procedurally protect collective bargaining, the right to strike and the independence of unions from management, provide space for relatively autonomous regulation of the unionized economic sector. However, there is far less constitutional protection for substantive norms governing workplace relations. Nonetheless, the relative autonomy of labour and employment law may constitute a barrier against illiberal, populist distortion of labour market regulation. La mesure dans laquelle le droit du travail forme un sous-systeme autonome a l’interieur de l’ordre juridique est une question importante dans les etudes en relations de travail. La theorie de la capacite humaine aide a expliquer l’emergence de maniere relativement autonome de concepts juridiques ouverts pour structurer les relations de travail. De meme, les concepts de droits relationnels et la theorie des contrats relationnels nous aident a comprendre le developpement relativement autonome de la reglementation restaurative du marche du travail et ses dimensions substantive et procedurale. De plus, des modifications profondes au principe de la liberte d’association sous le regime de la Charte, qui protege aujourd’hui efficacement, sur le plan procedural, la negociation collective, le droit de greve et l’independance des syndicats face aux gestionnaires, creent un espace pour la reglementation relativement autonome du secteur economique syndique. Toutefois, la protection constitutionnelle des principes regissant la substance des relations en milieu de travail est beaucoup moins forte. Neanmoins, l’autonomie relative du droit du travail peut constituer un obstacle a la distorsion populiste et attentatoire de la reglementation du marche du travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".