MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751295531 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2017.08.022

2017 Comprehensive Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure

2017· article· en· W2751295531 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Justin A. Ezekowitz, Eileen O’Meara, Michael McDonald, Howard Abrams, Michael Chan, Anique Ducharme, Nadia Giannetti, Adam Grzeslo, Peter Hamilton, George Heckman, Jonathan G. Howlett, Sheri L. Koshman, Serge Lepage, Robert S. McKelvie, Gordon W. Moe, Miroslaw Rajda, Elizabeth Swiggum, Sean Virani, Shelley Zieroth, Abdul Al‐Hesayen, Alain Cohen‐Solal, Michel D’Astous, Sabe De, E. Estrella-Holder, Stephen E. Fremes, Lee A. Green, Haissam Haddad, Karen Harkness, Adrian F. Hernandez, Simon Kouz, Marie-Hélène LeBlanc, Frederick A. Masoudi, Heather J. Ross, André Roussin, Bruce Sussex

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité LavalUniversity of SaskatchewanQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversité de MontréalSt. Boniface HospitalSt. Michael's HospitalMcGill UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversité de MonctonUniversité de SherbrookeWestern UniversityUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster UniversityRoyal Jubilee HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of CalgaryHamilton Health SciencesUniversity of AlbertaUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British ColumbiaMontreal Heart InstituteCegep regional de Lanaudiere
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyIntensive care medicineReferralEjection fractionCardiologyFamily medicineAnginaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations687
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207