MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751444855 · doi:10.14740/cii.v2i2-3.33

Pattern of Antibiotic Usage in Rural and Sub-Urban Settings in Bangladesh: Experience From a Primary Health Care Facility

2017· article· en· W2751444855 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pratyay Hasan, Kazi Tuba-E Mozazfia, Mohammad Zaid Hossain, Rowshan Rowan

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infection and Immunity · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical prescriptionFamily medicineAntibioticsConstipationObservational studyDiarrheaHealth carePediatricsSurgeryNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Bangladesh is not exempted from the grave dangers of antibiotic resistance and the other problems arising from its misuse. The prevalent aberrations in the practice of using antibiotics in Bangladesh include self-medication, prescription by quacks and non-physicians, non-registered “village doctors”, irrational prescription, etc. The resultant rises in resistant strains of several bacteria are also seen, and probably much is yet unseen and unnoticed. Methods: This observational descriptive study attempted to describe the actual scenario. A total of 155 patients (60% male and 40% female) were included in this study with consecutive purposive sampling who took antibiotics prior to coming to the primary health care facility. Results: Most common problems were common cold symptoms, only fever with or without body ache but without any other specific features and gastrointestinal upset (constipation/diarrhea/abdominal pain) with/without fever. Most (67.9%) of the patients also had taken some antibiotics in the past year for similar reasons, most common of which is “mixed reasons”, followed by common cold. Most of the time, the antibiotic was prescribed by drug seller at medicine store (89, 57.4%), followed by quack/village doctor (29, 18.7%). In mere 14.2% of cases, the antibiotic was prescribed by registered Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) doctors (22, 14.2%). Most have no clear idea about the definition of a doctor, and most (137, 89%) consider non-medical as doctors and think them to be qualified enough to prescribe antibiotic. About 80% of the respondents had no idea or flawed idea about importance of regularity in taking antibiotics, or completion of the course or the concept and threat of antibiotic resistance. Most commonly taken antibiotic was ciprofloxacin (38, 24.7%), followed by cefixime (30, 19.5%), and azithromycin (26, 16.9%). Patients had already spent from a minimum of 12 Bangladeshi Taka (BDT) to a maximum of 675 BDT, average being 166.61 BDT and a median of 117 BDT, before they came for consultation. So the economic impact is also not negligible. Conclusion: This study shows that gross misuse of antibiotics is being done in Bangladesh. Most of the responsibilities of gross misuse belong to two parties, non-physicians, illegal medical practitioners, quacks, and lack of awareness among the patients. Clin Infect Immun. 2017;2(2-3):19-26 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii33w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infection and ImmunitySame topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207