MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751501579 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.276

Trends in Outpatient Bacteremia in British Columbia, Canada between 2010 and 2015

2017· article· en· W2751501579 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah Cherian, Romina C. Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBacteremiaCiprofloxacinBlood cultureStreptococcus pneumoniaeEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumKlebsiella pneumoniaeMeropenemMicrobiologyPopulationEnterococcusEpidemiologyCoagulaseSalmonellaStaphylococcus aureusAntibioticsInternal medicineStaphylococcusAntibiotic resistanceBiologyEnvironmental healthBacteriaEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the epidemiology of etiologic organisms that cause bacteremia in the community setting is important for treatment and prevention strategies. In British Columbia, Lifelabs Medical Laboratories receives specimens submitted for blood culture from 128 community collection sites distributed across the province. We explored the trends in outpatient blood cultures in British Columbia between 2010 and 2015. Blood cultures drawn at community based Lifelabs collection sites between 2010–2015 were included in the study. Cultures and identification were performed according to routine laboratory methods. Basic demographic information including age, gender, and organism cultured were collected. Antibiotic-resistant organisms included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis or faecium (VRE), ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella sp., extended spectrum β lactamase (ESBL) positive Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Between 2010- 2015, a total of 16,619 sets of blood cultures were drawn, for an average sampling rate of 60.56 per 100,000 population. Of the total of 16,619 sets of blood cultures, 342 sets (2.05%) were considered to be significant isolates. The 66 sets of contaminants (0.04%) included predominantly coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS). The eight most common organisms constituted 85.3% of the total positive isolates. Among these organisms, there was no significant change in proportion between 2010 and 2015. Both Salmonella sp. and Streptococcus pneumoniae showed a proportional decrease with age (P ≤ 0.008), while Klebsiella pneumoniae showed a proportional increase with age (P ≤ 0.001). No VRE or CRE were noted, while 30.4% of Salmonella sp. were ciprofloxacin resistant, 17.4% of Enterobacteriaceae were ESBL positive, and 6.45% of Staphylococcus aureus were MRSA. When analyzed over a 6-year period, there were no significant changes in the proportion of identified organisms. The proportion of antibiotic-resistant organism in the community is low. R. Reyes, Lifelabs Medical Laboratories: Employee, Salary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207