MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Differences in onset between eyes in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (<scp>LHON</scp>)

2017· article· en· W2751648436 on OpenAlexaff
H. Liu, Chiara La Morgia, Lidia Di Vito, Samir Nazarali, L. Gauthier, Misha F. Syed, Jasdeep S Chahal, Michael J. Ammar, Michele Carbonelli, Anna Maria De Negri, Alfredo A. Sadun, Valério Carelli, Rustum Karanjia

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeber's hereditary optic neuropathyMedicineOphthalmologyOptic neuropathyOptic nerve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy ( LHON ) is an inherited mitochondrial disease characterized by a painless, subacute loss of central vision with over 95% of affected patients harbouring one of three mitochondrial DNA (mt DNA ) classical point mutations (m.11778G&gt;A, m.3460G&gt;A and m.14484T&gt;C). The purpose of this study was to compare the age of disease onset and time interval between affected eyes by mutation. Methods Age of onset, unilateral versus bilateral presentation, interval between the first and second eye, and the mt DNA mutation were retrieved from two separate database registries consisting of 268 Italian and 71 U.S. patients. Results Clinical data from 300 LHON patients with classical LHON mutations were evaluated (m.11778G&gt;A, n = 216; m.3460G&gt;A, n = 40; m.14484T&gt;C, n = 44. Bilateral eye involvement was clinically documented in 99.4% of cases with 50.3% of all patients demonstrating sequential onset. In these latter cases the median inter‐eye delay was 12.8 weeks. Comparing the age of onset across mutation subtypes, the m.14484T&gt;C mutation resulted in the lowest age at onset (19.2 ± 10.6 years) compared to m.11778G&gt;A (25.8 ± 15.3 years) and m.3460G&gt;A (20.9 ± 14.5 years) (p &lt; 0.05). Interestingly, the m.14484T&gt;C mutation exhibited more simultaneous than sequential onsets compared with the other two mutation subtypes (p &lt; 0.001). Moreover, m.14484T&gt;C showed a shorter and more reproducible interval between eyes (inter‐eye onset range = 1–44 weeks) versus m.11778G&gt;A (range = 1–2016 weeks) and m.3460G&gt;A (range = 2–816 weeks) for sequential presentations. Conclusions The m.14484T&gt;C mutation, though least penetrant, manifested at an earlier age and resulted in a smaller inter‐eye delay interval range and higher incidence of simultaneous involvement compared to the other two classical mutations in LHON .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OphthalmologicaSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207