Does Differentiated Squamous Intraepithelial Neoplasia Occur in the Cervix?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Invasive cervical cell squamous carcinoma (ICC) classically develops from high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of usual type (uCIN). Differentiated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (dCIN) analogue to differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia has not been described in the cervix. METHODS: A pilot case of ICC developing from dCIN with atypia limited to the basal/parabasal layers, focally associated with neoplastic spread above the parabasal layer (usual-like CIN pattern or u-like CIN) was identified. The previous cervical biopsy was under-diagnosed as low grade CIN. A total of 33 consecutive cases of ICC were reviewed to identify dCIN, u-like CIN and uCIN. RESULTS: The ICC developed from dCIN/u-like CIN in 2 patients, 46 and 47-year-old (group 1), mixed dCIN/u-like CIN and uCIN in 7 patients, 36±3-year-old (group 2) and from uCIN in 24 patients, 47±9-year-old (group 3). In group 1, focal uCIN but not connected to ICC was also seen and Pap smears showed only hyper-keratinized cells with mildly atypical nuclei. Endocervical gland involvement by CIN was absent in group 1, focal in group 2 and extensive in group 3. All cases showed diffuse p16 staining. P53 reactivity was noted in basal/parabasal in dCIN, predominantly lower and upper parts of the epithelium in groups 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Totally, 27% of ICC cases had associated dCIN/u-like CIN and in younger patients than in the uCIN group. Larger studies are needed to confirm dCIN/u-like CIN as significant precursor lesions of ICC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".