Clinical relevance of 18F-FDG PET/CT lower-limb imaging in patients with malignant cutaneous melanoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of imaging the lower limbs when using 2-(F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) for malignant cutaneous melanoma in patients without previously known or suspected primary or metastatic melanoma lesions in the lower limbs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 880 consecutive F-FDG PET/CT scans performed for adult patients in a context of suspected melanoma spanning a period of 5 years. All scans were correlated with the associated patient records (clinical history, physical examinations, and pathology reports), as well as follow-up imaging examinations, up until at least 6 months after the end of the study. RESULTS: Among the 461 whole-body scans included for analysis, 109 reported unusual activity in the lower limbs, but with at most 21 scans showing lower-limb lesions attributed to melanoma on follow-up. No scan showed melanoma lesions exclusively in the lower limbs, and in no case did imaging the lower limbs upstage a patient. Imaging the lower limbs changed the actual clinical management of the melanoma for only one patient, with precautionary local radiation therapy administered following the detection of an asymptomatic distal femur bone metastasis in an otherwise plurimetastatic patient headed for palliative care. CONCLUSION: Our study, the largest of its kind, confirms that, when using F-FDG PET/CT for staging, restaging, or surveillance of malignant cutaneous melanoma in patients without previously known or suspected lower-limb melanoma lesions, imaging the lower extremities offers little additional clinically relevant information and stopping the scan at the proximal thighs has essentially no clinical impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".