MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751965811 · doi:10.1109/arith.2017.37

A New Multiplicative Inverse Architecture in Normal Basis Using Novel Concurrent Serial Squaring and Multiplication

2017· article· en· W2751965811 on OpenAlexafffund
Amin Monfared, Hayssam El-Razouk, Arash Reyhani-Masoleh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceMultiplication (music)Latency (audio)Application-specific integrated circuitFinite fieldMultiplicative inverseStochastic computingMultiplicative functionNormal basisCMOSParallel computingAlgorithmComputationInverseArithmeticMathematicsGalois theoryComputer hardwareDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Itoh and Tsujii proposed a fast algorithm for computing multiplicative inverses (inversions) over GF(2m) using normal bases by iterating single multiplications and cyclic shifts. Recently, the Itoh-Tsujii algorithm (ITA) has been modified to use two digit-level single multiplications. The improvements of the modified Itoh-Tsujii and its variant algorithms are based on reducing the computational latency at the expense of more area requirements. In this paper, we propose a new inversion architecture based on the classical IT algorithm (or improved one) utilizing a novel interleaved computations of two single multiplications and squarings at the digit-level. The new inverter outperforms previous modified Itoh-Tsujii algorithms (such as the Ternary Itoh-Tsujii and optimal 3-chain algorithms) in terms of its lower latency, higher throughput, and improved hardware efficiency. The efficiency of the proposed field inverter is demonstrated by comparisons based on application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) implementations results using the standard 65nm CMOS technology libraries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207