MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752001503

Wheat Yield and Use of Moisture on Substations in Southern Saskatchewan1

2016· article· en· W2752001503 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. J. Staple, J. J. Lehane

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of agricultural science/Canadian Journal of Agricultural Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBushelEvapotranspirationMoistureAcreYield (engineering)Environmental scienceLinear regressionCropWater contentAgronomyMathematicsHydrology (agriculture)MeteorologyStatisticsGeographyAgroforestryBiologyEcologyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twelve years’ data on the use of moisture by wheat crops at seven Experimental Substations were summarized. The linear regression of yield on evapotranspiration showed an increase of 3 5 bushels per acre for each additional inch of water used by the crop The relationship was actually curvilinear so that for high evapotranspiration the increase per inch was approximately 6 bushels per acre These increases resulted not only from the direct benefits of moisture availability, but also from all factors associated with evapotranspiration that were favourable to the crop. The estimate of yield on the substations was significantly improved when rainfall and stored moisture were used as separate variables. The regression coefficient for rainfall was 1 5 times that for stored moisture This ratio was greater than that obtained from long-time tank and field experiments at Swift Current. The total variance in yield was divided into parts due to differences between substations, between seasons and residual variance. Af...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of agricultural science/Canadian Journal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207