Scalable Interactive Modular Systems (SIMS): sustainability for digital interfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
: Design and sustainability have long been reviewed and explored by designers, creators and policy makers. Despite the acknowledgement of the importance and need for sustainable design, little is known regarding the process that leads to one. It is important to recognise that sustainability is a system property and thus a systems perspective (including both micro and macro level changes) is necessary to fully appreciate and guide sustainable and innovative designs. SYSTEMATEKS (SIMS) is a forward thinking design concept/process that can inform sustainable and regenerative designs. The present paper demonstrates an application of SIMS (Scalable, Interactive, Modular (able) systems) for designing a digital interface that allows for visualizing key infrastructure information (i.e. Information regarding municipality and key economic factors associated with it). The findings demonstrate a successful application of SIMS process to guide and inform a truly flexible and resilience digital interface that is modular and scalable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it