MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Roles of GPD1 in Maintaining Blood Glucose Levels under Fasting Conditions

2016· article· en· W2752046663 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tomoki Sato, Akihito Morita, Nobuko Mori, Shinji Miura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBio-oriented Technology Research Advancement InstitutionCouncil for Science, Technology and InnovationSwine Innovation Porc
KeywordsGluconeogenesisInternal medicineEndocrinologyGlycerolBiologyCarbohydrate metabolismCarbohydrateMetabolismBiochemistryChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glucose is used as one of the energy sources in many organs. Under feeding conditions, glucose can be obtained from dietary carbohydrate. On the other hand, when external supply of energy is interrupted, such as fasting, carbohydrate preserved in liver and glycogenic precursor derived from other organs are used to maintain blood glucose levels. Glycerol and glycogenic amino acid derived from adipocyte and skeletal muscle, respectively, are utilized as glycogenic precursor. But, it hasn't become clear which glycogenic precursor is more important in gluconeogenesis. The recent study revealed that Metformin, therapeutics for treating type 2 diabetes, depressed gluconeogenesis from glycerol by inhibition of glycerol‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) 2. This result suggests that glycerol have a potent impact on gluconeogenesis. In this study, we focused attention on GPD1, which is the enzyme that related gluconeogenesis using glycerol, and examined the roles of GPD1 in gluconeogenesis and importance of glycerol as glycogenic precursor. Using GPD1 null mutant model BALB/cHeA mice (HeA mice), we measured the change of blood glucose levels under fasting conditions and gene expressions related to gluconeogenesis in liver. BALB/cBy mice (By mice) were used as a control. In HeA mice, blood glucose levels at 1 to 4 hour after fasting were significantly higher than the By mice. The hepatic gene expressions involved in gluconeogenesis and aminotransferase such as glucose‐6‐phosphatase and alanine amino transferase were also higher than the By mice. Moreover, we examined availability of the glycogenic amino acid by alanine tolerance test. At 30 min after alanine administration, blood glucose level was significantly higher in the HeA mice. In short, these data suggests that lacking of GPD1 maintained blood glucose levels under fasting state by enhancing gluconeogenesis from glycogenic amino acid and release of glucose into the blood stream. Support or Funding Information This study was supported by the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI), Cross‐ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP, No.14533567), and “Technologies for creating next‐generation agriculture, forestry and fisheries” (funding agency: Bio‐oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, NARO), Grants‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI, No. 15J10165, 15K00827) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT, Tokyo), and University of Shizuoka Grant for Scientific and Educational Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→