Los resultados de la Cumbre Climática de Marrakech: antecedentes y perspectivas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLa Cumbre Climatica de Marrakech ha servido para establecer una Hoja de Ruta de implementacion del Acuerdo de Paris en el horizonte 2018. En este marco se ha mantenido el impulso politico en materia de accion global contra el cambio climatico y se ha desarrollado un marco de colaboracion entre agentes gubernamentales y no gubernamentales para alcanzar los objetivos de reduccion de emisiones lo antes posible. A lo largo de 2016 tambien se han producido avances en materia de accion climatica fuera de la CMNUCC, destacando el acuerdo global para reducir emisiones en el sector de la aviacion y la enmienda al Protocolo de Montreal. EnglishMarrakech Climate Summit has settled the Roadmap to the Paris Agreement implementation on the 2018 horizon. This Roadmap has allowed to maintain the political momentum on global climate action and to develop a partnership framework among governmental and non-governmental stakeholders in order to achieve emissions reduction targets as soon as possible. Other relevant breakthroughs on climate action away from UNFCCC have taken place during 2016: the global emission reduction agreement for international aviation and the amendment to the Montreal Protocol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it