MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752324627 · doi:10.5114/jhi.2017.69173

Can online pharmacies address health inequalities in low- and middle-income countries? The International Forum on Patient Safety and Safe Access to Online Pharmacies, New Delhi, India (1-2 March 2017) thinks they will

2017· article· en· W2752324627 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jolanta Bilińska, Kawaldip Sehmi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health Inequalities · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacyInequalityGlobal healthMedicineLow and middle income countriesDeveloping countryPublic healthPolitical scienceEconomic growthFamily medicineNursingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Bilińska J, Sehmi K. Can online pharmacies address health inequalities in low- and middle-income countries? The International Forum on Patient Safety and Safe Access to Online Pharmacies, New Delhi, India (1-2 March 2017) thinks they will. Journal of Health Inequalities. 2017;3(1):96-97. doi:10.5114/jhi.2017.69173. APA Bilińska, J., & Sehmi, K. (2017). Can online pharmacies address health inequalities in low- and middle-income countries? The International Forum on Patient Safety and Safe Access to Online Pharmacies, New Delhi, India (1-2 March 2017) thinks they will. Journal of Health Inequalities, 3(1), 96-97. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhi.2017.69173 Chicago Bilińska, Jolanta, and Kawaldip Sehmi. 2017. "Can online pharmacies address health inequalities in low- and middle-income countries? The International Forum on Patient Safety and Safe Access to Online Pharmacies, New Delhi, India (1-2 March 2017) thinks they will". Journal of Health Inequalities 3 (1): 96-97. doi:10.5114/jhi.2017.69173. Harvard Bilińska, J., and Sehmi, K. (2017). Can online pharmacies address health inequalities in low- and middle-income countries? The International Forum on Patient Safety and Safe Access to Online Pharmacies, New Delhi, India (1-2 March 2017) thinks they will. Journal of Health Inequalities, 3(1), pp.96-97. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhi.2017.69173 MLA Bilińska, Jolanta et al. "Can online pharmacies address health inequalities in low- and middle-income countries? The International Forum on Patient Safety and Safe Access to Online Pharmacies, New Delhi, India (1-2 March 2017) thinks they will." Journal of Health Inequalities, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 96-97. doi:10.5114/jhi.2017.69173. Vancouver Bilińska J, Sehmi K. Can online pharmacies address health inequalities in low- and middle-income countries? The International Forum on Patient Safety and Safe Access to Online Pharmacies, New Delhi, India (1-2 March 2017) thinks they will. Journal of Health Inequalities. 2017;3(1):96-97. doi:10.5114/jhi.2017.69173.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health InequalitiesSame topicHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207