Hemilability of the 1,2-Bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (dmpe) Ligand in Cp*Mo(NO)(κ<sup>2</sup>-dmpe)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reaction of Cp*Mo(NO)Cl 2 with 1 equiv of 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (dmpe) in THF at ambient temperature forms [Cp*Mo(NO)(Cl)(κ 2 -dmpe)]Cl ( 1 ), which is isolable as an analytically pure yellow powder in 65% yield. Further addition of 2 equiv of Cp 2 Co to 1 in CH 2 Cl 2 affords dark red Cp*Mo(NO)(κ 2 -dmpe) ( 2 ), which was isolated in 36% yield by recrystallization from Et 2 O at −30 °C. Reaction of a benzene solution of 2 with an equimolar amount of elemental sulfur results in the immediate production of dark blue (μ-S)[Cp*Mo(NO)(κ 1 -dmpeS)] 2 ( 3 ), which is a rare example of a bimetallic transition-metal complex bridged by only a single sulfur atom and involving Mo═S═Mo bonding. In contrast, reaction of 2 with an excess of sulfur in benzene results in the formation of Cp*Mo(NO)(η 2 -S 2 )(κ 1 -dmpeS) ( 4 ). Complex 4 can also be formed by the addition of elemental sulfur to 3, thereby indicating that 3 is a precursor to 4 . Cp*Mo(NO)(κ 2 -dmpe) ( 2 ) also undergoes interesting transformations when treated with organic bromides. For instance, reaction of 2 with 5 equiv benzyl bromide in THF produces the bimetallic complex (μ-dmpe)[Cp*Mo(NO)Br 2 ] 2 ( 5 ) and bibenzyl after 4 d at 70 °C probably via radical intermediates. In contrast to its reaction with benzyl bromide, complex 2 forms [Mo(NO)Br 2 (κ 2 -dmpe)] 2 ( 6 ), olefin, alkane, and Cp*H when treated with 5 equiv of 1-bromopropane or 1-bromooctane in THF at 70 °C for 72 h. Interestingly, complex 2 does not display any reactivity with bromobenzene or 1-bromoadamantane even after being heated for several days at 70 °C. All new complexes were characterized by conventional spectroscopic and analytical methods, and the solid-state molecular structures of most of them were established by single-crystal X-ray crystallographic analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".