Hexokinase 2 is a Key Mediator of Aerobic Glycolysis Promoting Tumour Growth in Glioblastoma Multiforme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proliferating tissues, including embryonic and tumour tissues, preferentially employ aerobic glycolysis to support cell growth. This reliance on glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen, referred to as the “Warburg Effect”, may confer a proliferative, survival and invasive advantage and be exploited therapeutically. In this thesis, we demonstrate that the glycolytic enzyme Hexokinase 2 (HK2) is crucial for the “Warburg Effect” in human Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), the most common and therapeutically resistant malignant brain tumour. In contrast to normal brain and low-grade gliomas, GBMs exhibited a marked increase in HK2 expression, but not HK1, particularly in perinecrotic, hypoxic regions and its expression predicted poor overall survival of GBM patients. Stable loss of HK2 in GBM cells restored oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)-mediated glucose metabolism, with increased oxygen consumption and decreased lactic acid production, an effect not seen with loss of glycolytic enzymes HK1 or PKM2. Furthermore, HK2 depletion resulted in decreased proliferation in vitro and in vivo and increased sensitivity to apoptotic inducers such as radiation and chemotherapy, both common adjuvant therapies of GBMs. Intracranial xenografts of GBM cells with reduced HK2 demonstrated significantly increased survival with decreased proliferation and angiogenesis yet enhanced invasiveness. In contrast, exogenous HK2 expression in GBM cells promoted proliferation, therapeutic resistance and intracranial growth. This was dependent partly on the PI3K/AKT dependent translocation of HK2 to the mitochondrial membrane. Stable loss of glycolytic enzymes HK2, HK1 and PKM2 reduced GBM proliferation but differentially altered the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and AMPK signaling pathways, the extent to which may influence whether a cell preferentially undergoes autophagy or apoptosis as the primary mode of cell death. Collectively, targeting enzymes employed by the tumour to modulate its energy metabolism, such as HK2 in GBMs, may favourably alter its therapeutic sensitivity to radiation and both classical and novel chemotherapeutic agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".