MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752426088 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1353

Single Dose IV Peramivir Treatment in Pediatric Influenza: Lack of Development of Influenza Virus Variants with Reduced Susceptibility to Peramivir

2017· article· en· W2752426088 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Ève Hamelin, Yacine Abed, Julie Carbonneau, Rienk E. Jeeninga, Saskia L. Smits, Smail Kulenovic, Katyna Borroto–Esoda, Ray Taylor, Phil Collis, Guy Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineZanamivirOseltamivirNeuraminidaseNeuraminidase inhibitorVirusInfluenzavirus BVirologyInternal medicineInfluenza A virusTiterOrthomyxoviridaeImmunologyGastroenterologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peramivir (PVR) is a potent neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) with in vitro activity against all influenza virus subtypes. Previous studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of peramivir as a single dose intravenous (IV) treatment for acute uncomplicated influenza in adults. A phase 3 study compared age-appropriate single dose IV PVR to 5 days of oral oseltamivir (OSE) (4:1 randomization, stratified by age) in pediatric subjects age 0–17 years within 48 hours of acute uncomplicated influenza symptom onset. Influenza infection and subtype was confirmed by PCR. In vitro susceptibility of cultured virus to PVR, OSE and zanamivir (ZVR) from paired baseline/ post-treatment nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs was performed with a MUNANA assay. Sequence analysis of NA and hemagglutinin (HA) genes was performed from uncultured virus. 122 subjects were enrolled up to a cutoff date of March 31, 2017 (<2 yrs, n = 7; 2-<7yrs, n = 37; 7-<13 yrs, n = 48; 13–17 yrs, n = 30). Data is shown on 108 subjects randomized prior to the 2016–17 season, of which 101 (94%) received study drug. Full data will be reported. Influenza was confirmed in 75 (74%) subjects who received study drug: A/H1N1, n = 31 (41%); B, n = 27 (36%); A/H3N2, n = 15 (20%); A/indeterminate and A/H1N1/ B co-infected, 1 each. Baseline IC50 s for each subtype are summarized: Two treatment-emergent substitutions were detected in NA or HA genes of PVR-treated subjects: a NA S67A (reversion to wild type) in an influenza B virus and a HA V496V/F mixture in an A/H1N1 virus. Neither substitution was associated with a resistant phenotype. Among PVR treated subjects, no changes were observed in the last positive post-baseline sample PVR median IC50 compared with baseline and no individual subject treated with PVR had an IC50 fold-change from baseline greater than 1.63. Peramivir had the greatest potency of 3 NAIs tested for all baseline virus subtypes in the order: PVR < ZVR < OSE. Treatment with a single dose of IV PVR was not associated with development of resistance to the drug in this pediatric population. M. È. Hamelin, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Collaborator, Research support; Y. Abed, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Collaborator, Research support; J. Carbonneau, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Collaborator, Research support; R. Jeeninga, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Collaborator, Research support; S. Smits, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Collaborator, Research support; S. Kulenovic, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Collaborator, Research support; K. Borroto-Esoda, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultant, Consulting fee; R. Taylor, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Employee, Salary; P. Collis, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Employee, Salary; G. Boivin, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Collaborator, Research support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207