Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenuePhysics Letters B · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAustralian Research CouncilSeventh Framework ProgrammeHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"Fondation Partager le SavoirServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesShota Rustaveli National Science FoundationInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseEuropean Regional Development FundBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftNella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurological Diseases, Weizmann Institute of ScienceMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiNarodowe Centrum NaukiCanada Foundation for InnovationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftNational Research Council CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekChinese Academy of SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentDanmarks GrundforskningsfondScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaMinistrstvo za Izobraževanje, Znanost in ŠportAgence Nationale de la RechercheComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDepartment of Science and Technology, Republic of South AfricaAustrian Science FundJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSNational Research FoundationGeneralitat ValencianaGeneralitat de CatalunyaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyIsrael Science FoundationEuropean Social FundCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueRoyal SocietyNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFCanada Council for the ArtsCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceU.S. Department of EnergyOntario Innovation TrustCERNCanarieInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareUnited States-Israel Binational Science FoundationHelmholtz-GemeinschaftH2020 European Research CouncilNorges ForskningsrådNatur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd
KeywordsPhysicsHiggs bosonParticle physicsBosonDark matterStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Large Hadron ColliderBranching fractionNuclear physicsATLAS experimentPhysics beyond the Standard Model
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexA search for an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark matter candidates produced in association with a leptonically decaying Z boson in proton–proton collisions at s = 13 TeV is presented. This search uses 36.1 fb − 1 of data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. No significant deviation from the expectation of the Standard Model backgrounds is observed. Assuming the Standard Model ZH production cross-section, an observed (expected) upper limit of 67% (39%) at the 95% confidence level is set on the branching ratio of invisible decays of the Higgs boson with mass m H = 125 GeV . The corresponding limits on the production cross-section of the ZH process with the invisible Higgs boson decays are also presented. Furthermore, exclusion limits on the dark matter candidate and mediator masses are reported in the framework of simplified dark matter models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
