Dissimilar joining of Carbon/Carbon composites to Ti6Al4V and copper by reactive resistance spot welding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to develop an innovative and user-friendly method for dissimilar joining of the carbon/carbon (C/C) composites to Ti6Al4V and copper through reactive resistance spot welding to form the hybrid structures. The C/C composites used in this study were a 2D C/C composite with high porosity (low strength) and a 3D C/C composite with low porosity content (high strength). It was found that the infiltration of Ti into the C/C composite and formation of a continuous thin TiC layer at the interface of the joints are the dominant mechanisms of the joining. The 2D C/C composite with the flat surface was successfully joined to Ti6Al4V due to the infiltration of the melted Ti6Al4V into the porosity of the 2D C/C composite. On the other hand, it was required to drill the rectangular grooves on the surface of the 3D C/C composite to facilitate the infiltration of the melted Ti into the 3D C/C composite and consequently obtain high strength joints. The strength of 2D C/C composite-Ti6Al4V joints was 7 MPa due to failure of the joints within the low strength 2D C/C composite. By contrast, the maximum strength of the joints using the groove-patterned high-strength 3D C/C composite was 46.14 ± 3.92 MPa. In the case of joining between the 2D C/C composite and copper, the Ti thin sheet and Ti powder interlayers were used. Regarding the joints with the Ti sheet interlayer, some defects and cracks were formed at the interface of the joints, which decreased the strength of the joints, whereas in the case of using the Ti powder interlayer, defect-free joints were obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".