MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752722281 · doi:10.3920/wmj2016.2174

Correlation and variability between weighing, counting and analytical methods to determine ergot (Claviceps purpurea) contamination of grain

2017· article· en· W2752722281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Mycotoxin Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and fungal interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsClaviceps purpureaMycotoxinChemistryAlkaloidCoefficient of variationAnimal scienceContaminationFood scienceBiologyChromatographyStereochemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ergot alkaloid mycotoxins produced by the fungus Claviceps purpurea, are contaminants of cereal crops and grasses. The objectives of this study were to determine the correlation between number of ergot sclerotia and weight compared to the total ergot alkaloid concentration, to evaluate the effect of grinding process (i.e. particle size (PS)) on ergot alkaloid analysis using high performance liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry, and to determine the impact of sample volume on analytical variability. This study demonstrated that correlations exist between both ergot sclerotia count (R 2 =0.7242, P <0.001) and ergot sclerotia weight (R 2 =0.9618, P <0.001) compared to the total alkaloid concentration of 6 ergot alkaloids. However, at alkaloid ergot concentrations below 350 µg/kg grain, ergot sclerotia count (R 2 =0.0002, P =0.956) and ergot sclerotia weight (R 2 =0.0064, P =0.769) were not correlated to the total alkaloid concentration. A lower variability ( P =0.041), defined by coefficient of variation (CV), was observed using a commercial UDY cyclone sample mill (PS=192 µm, CV=9 µg/kg) as compared to a household coffee grinder (PS=516 µm, CV=66 µg/kg). Total amount and concentration of individual ergot alkaloids varied ( P <0.05) among sclerotia of similar weight. For the analytical method, CV was numerically reduced as sample volume increased (97% CV for 75 ml to 64% CV for 1000 ml; mean of all concentrations) but increased as sample concentration declined (17% CV for 81,678 µg/kg to 284% for 35 µg/kg; mean of all sample volumes). This implies that analysis of small sample volumes at low ergot alkaloid concentrations may result in highly variable and potentially misleading results. In conclusion, number of ergot sclerotia and weight are unreliable indicators of alkaloid content at ergot concentrations below 350 µg/kg and particle size influences the variability. An analytical approach with fine grinding (mean PS<200 µm, 85% particles <400 µm) of a large sample should be used to assess low-level ergot contamination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it