MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752733015 · doi:10.14740/cii.v2i2-3.36

The Resurgence of Syphilis

2017· article· en· W2752733015 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shannon H. Carroll, Rebecca Tamarkin, Emmanuel Decade

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infection and Immunity · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSyphilisPrimary SyphilisMaculopapular rashRashNeurosyphilisPopulationPediatricsRapid plasma reaginSurgeryTreponemaImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection that can lead to deadly outcomes in both the male and female population if not treated appropriately and in a timely manner. This is a case of a 27-year-old Caucasian male with no past medical history who presented with a generalized, erythematous, maculopapular rash for the past 2 weeks. Patient initially presented with prodromal symptoms 2 weeks prior to rash development. After failure of multiple treatments, screening for sexually transmitted infections was performed, which returned a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer of 1:128. The patient was diagnosed with secondary syphilis and immediately treated with three injections of bicillin L-A (penicillin G) for three consecutive weeks. This case is important to current medical practice due to the rise of primary and secondary syphilis in the adult male and female population, especially those aged 20 - 29 years. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the rate of reported primary and secondary syphilis cases has increased 19% since 2001. Prompt treatment of primary or secondary syphilis can prevent progression to tertiary syphilis and potential development of neurosyphilis, decreased visual acuity, hearing loss, vascular disease leading to thrombosis, ischemia and infarction, ataxia, and paresis. Clin Infect Immun. 2017;2(2-3):31-35 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii64e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infection and ImmunitySame topicSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207