Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are three texts before me, like the law. Each possesses letters; discusses letters; explores epistolary traditions; inquires after the relevance of letters, in philosophy and literature; is aware of letters as graphics, form (genre, the letter as extended apostrophe), and literature. They are stuffed with other texts and themselves, folded, folding with(in) (out) one another, priority varying according to certain protocols (teaching, reading, writing, calendars, correspondences, genres, disciplines, [illiteracies, languages, etc.). They are besotted with letters, postcards, and, at times implausibly, one another. The table of their titles is below (with how they will be hereafter referenced within square brackets following the title) without the authors' names (included herewith, John Barth and Jacques Derrida, although multiple authors are assigned, resigned [to], refused, forged, and referred to within these texts). LA CARTE POSTALE: de Socrate a Freud et au-dela [C] GLAS [G] A NOLD TIMEE PISTO LARY NOV EL [L] B Y S E V E N F I C T I T I O U S D RO L L S& DRE AM E R S E A C H O F W H I C H I M A GINE SHIM S E LFAC T U AL These three texts are (not) always cited or discussed in the order of the table; they are anencrypted amid translation assigned, one to another. The original publication dates are disordered: 1980, 1974, and 1979, respectively (more so, with the dates of translation: 1987 and 1986, respectively, thrown in in an anxiety of influence). I impose serious patterns you will find amusing, not serious enough, illiterate at times, illegible, laughable, forgettable, coded, imperative: e.g., IC: Immaculate Conception, Imperatif Categorique in [G], Implausible Coincidence in [L], Index Codicillorum [Aside on sorting, posts, and Maxwell's Demon: The organization Trystero--the mysterious communication system that Oedipa knew a few things about [...] it had opposed the Thurn and Taxis postal system in Europe; its symbol was a muted post horn; sometime before 1853 it had appeared in America [...] it survived today [...] for those [...] who believed in the reality of Maxwell's Demon. [...] The Demon could sit in a box among air molecules that were moving at all different random speeds, and sort out the fast molecules from the slow ones. Fast molecules have more energy than slow ones. Concentrate enough of them in one place and you have a region of high temperature. You can then use the in temperature between this hot region of the box and any cooler region, to drive a heat engine. Since the Demon only sat and sorted, you wouldn't have put any real work into the system. So you would be violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics, getting something for nothing, causing perpetual motion (Pynchon 62, 80)]. (RESET) Graphic Interfaces--Letters Themselves: Some Letters of CGL and Some Besottements One to Another of These Three, CGL, as One History of Reason(s) (citations indicated by italics, quotation marks, parentheses, etc.) --The opening sentence of Glas: what, after all, of the remain(s), today, for us, here, now, of an (A- [I will speak, therefore, of the letter a, this initial letter which it apparently has been necessary to insinuate, here and there, into the writing of the word difference (Derrida, Differance 3 [27 January 1968]).] gle) [His name is so strange. From the eagle, aigle, it draws imperial or historic power. Those who still pronounce his name like the French (there are some) are ludicrous only up to a certain point: the restitution (semantically infallible for those who have read him a little--but only a little) of magisterial coldness and imperturbable seriousness, the eagle caught in ice and frost, glass and gel (G7; Gel on Hegel). …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".