MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752825565 · doi:10.1038/npre.2011.6430.1

PrionOme: A database of prions and other sequences relevant to prion phenomena

2011· preprint· en· W2752825565 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ramanathan Sowdhamini, Paul M. Harrison, Djamel Harbi, Parthiban Marimuthu, Deena M.A. Gendoo, Sepehr Ehsani, Manish Kumar, Gerold Schmitt‐Ulms

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Precedings · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsFungal prionPseudogeneComputational biologyBiologyMendelian inheritanceOrganismPrion proteinGeneticsDatabaseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastGenomeGeneComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prions are units of propagation of an altered state of a protein or proteins. Prions can propagate from cell to cell, and from organism to organism, through cooption of other protein copies. Prions contain no necessary nucleic acids, and are important both as both pathogenic agents, and as a potential force in epigenetic phenomena. The original prions were derived from a misfolded form of the mammalian Prion Protein PrP. Infection by these prions causes neurodegenerative diseases. Other prions cause non-Mendelian inheritance in budding yeast, and sometimes act as diseases of yeast. We have compiled a database of >2000 prion-related sequences, called the PrionOme. The database comprises seven PrionOme classification categories: prionogenic sequences (i.e., sequences that can make prions), ‘prionoids’ (i.e., phenomena that have some prion characteristics), orthologs, paralogs, pseudogenes, prion interactors, and prion-like molecules. Database entries list: supporting information for PrionOme classifications, prion-determinant areas (where relevant), and disordered and compositionally-biased regions. Also included are original references for the PrionOme classifications, transcripts and genomic coordinates, and structural data (including comparative models). We provide database usage examples for both vertebrate and fungal prion contexts. As development of this resource is on-going, we will be very happy to receive and act on any constructive comments from peer scientists in the areas of prion biology and protein misfolding, either by email or using the feedback form provided on the PrionOme website. We hope that this database will be a valuable experimental aid and reference resource. It is freely available at: http://libaio.biol.mcgill.ca/prion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature PrecedingsSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207