MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Targeting p53 mutant ovarian cancer: Phase I results of the WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775 with carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive, p53-mutant ovarian cancer (OC).

2013· article· en· W2752873349 on OpenAlexaff
Irene Braña, Kathleen N. Moore, Ronnie Shapira‐Frommer, Stephen Welch, Ying‐Ming Jou, Michelle Marinucci, Tomoko Freshwater, Shelonitda Rose, Amit M. Oza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsCancer Care OntarioPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeutropeniaInternal medicineCarboplatinFebrile neutropeniaTolerabilityOncologyAdverse effectCancerPhases of clinical researchTaxaneGastroenterologyChemotherapyCisplatinBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5518 Background: MK-1775 is a highly selective, investigational oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of WEE1, which regulates G2 cell cycle checkpoint. Functional p53 mutation impairs G1 checkpoint; hence, targeting G2 checkpoint with MK-1775 in p53 mutants should induce synthetic lethality. Methods: Pts with platinum-sensitive disease-recurrent OC who had measurable disease (RECIST 1.1) with loss of function (LOF) p53 mutations by Roche AmpliChip were eligible. All pts received MK-1775 225mg twice daily (BID) D1-D3 (5 doses) plus carboplatin AUC5 + paclitaxel 175mg/m2 every 21 days (CP) for 6 cycles. The objective for the phase I run-in portion of the study was to determine the recommended phase II dose based on safety data. A Toxicity Probability Interval method [Ji et al, Clin Trials 2010; 7(6):653-63] would determine if additional lower doses should be explored. A randomized phase II portion, assessing the efficacy of the combination vs placebo, would start if ≥5 radiological responses and <5 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed among the first 13 pts. Results: Of 76 pts screened (26 wt, 43 mutant [24 nonfunctional], 7 undetermined), 19 women had LOF p53 mutations and were eligible. Fifteen consented and were enrolled in the Phase I: median age was 57 (range 38-77); ECOG 0:1 ratio 9:6 pts. Three DLTs were observed: G3 febrile neutropenia, G4 neutropenia, and G4 thrombocytopenia. Diarrhea (84.6%), nausea (76.9%), and fatigue (76.9%) were the most common adverse events (AEs). Seven of 13 pts completed treatment (2 ongoing). Three pts discontinued due to AEs and 3 patients withdrew consent prior to completing treatment. Of 14 evaluable pts by RECIST 1.1 there were 11 partial responses (PRs; 6 confirmed, 5 unconfirmed) and 3 had stable disease; 7 pts were evaluable by CA125 with 3 complete responses and 4 PRs. MK-1775 PK results were similar to those reported for monotherapy studies. Conclusions: The combination of MK-1775 225mg BID x 5 doses with CP is well tolerated, with a preliminary radiological response rate of 78.6%, and has met the safety and efficacy bar for randomized phase II assessment in part 2 of the study. Clinical trial information: NCT01357161.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerFrench-language works237,207