MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753166820 · doi:10.1201/9780203704486-5

Superstructure replacement works for the Macdonald Suspension Bridge, Canada

2017· book-chapter· en· W2753166820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dusan Radojevic, Keith F. Kirkwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)DeckSuspension (topology)Structural engineeringEngineeringSpan (engineering)SuperstructureForensic engineeringMedicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Angus L. Macdonald Bridge, completed in 1955, connects Dartmouth and Halifax, NS, Canada. The suspension bridge is 762 m long, with a 441 m long main span. The bridge deck reached the end of its functional life and was replaced segment-by-segment during bridge weekend closures, with traffic using the bridge during the weekdays. New deck segments were fully prefabricated, including an initial layer of wearing surface, and erected in a way that allowed traffic to use the bridge immediately following replacement. Fabrication began in early 2015 and erection in late 2015. The last segment was replaced in 2017 February. Concurrently with the segment replacement, the entire deck was raised to its final profile (3 m at midspan) to allow for the increased shipping clearance. The hangers were then replaced. This paper describes some aspects of the superstructure fabrication, segment erection, and challenges encountered during erection. This paper describes investigation and rehabilitation work carried out since 2005. It includes some special investigations into low stress/high cycle fatigue testing of cracked wires and friction tests to refine the evaluation of broken wire redevelopment length. It seeks to provide lessons learned and guidance for suspension bridge owners on how to deal with similarly deteriorated cables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical stress and fatigue analysisFrench-language works237,207