MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753245155 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2017.225

Brainstem Radionecrosis in a Patient with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

2017· article· en· W2753245155 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Theodora Afrantou, Konstantinos Natsis, Aristomenis Angelou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNasopharyngeal carcinomaBrainstemContent (measure theory)MedicineRadiation therapySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 28-year-old female was admitted with a progressive gait disturbance, difficulty in swallowing, diplopia, and dysphonia.The neurological examination showed severe spastic paraparesis, pyramidal signs on the upper limbs, hoarseness, paresis of the left VI and VII, and bilateral impairment of all the lower cranial nerves.During examination of her medical history, she reported diabetes as well as nasopharyngeal carcinoma, for which she had undergone radiotherapy 1.5 years ago.She received a total dose of 63 Gy in 2-Gy fractions in three phases, which lasted for a period of 7 weeks.MRI revealed an extended lesion to the brainstem from midbrain to the medulla oblongata, which was shown to be hypointense on T1 and hyperintense on T2.This lesion presented a marked homogenous enhancement (Figure 1).The results of her standard biochemical examination were found normal.She was treated with 1 gr of methylprednizolone for 5 days, followed by gradual reduction of the dose.After 2 months of corticosteroid treatment, a mild clinical improvement was observed Cerebral radionecrosis is one of the late complications of radiation therapy for head and neck tumors.Severe clinical deterioration is characteristic, which in some cases may have a fatal outcome.The exact prevalence of radionecrosis is rather unknown, although an incidence rate of 5-35% has been reported in patients treated for intracranial tumors.For patients receiving a total dose of 55 Gy, the incidence rate varies between 3 and 5%.Generally, it is observed 6 months to 2 years after completion of the radiation therapy, and it mainly affects the cerebral white matter.The most commonly affected parts of the brain are the cerebral hemispheres, with a predilection for the temporal lobes and the cerebellum, whereas the brainstem is a rather rare site of involvement.Brainstem lesions include a wide range of differential diagnoses.Based on our patient's imaging, we should take into consideration tumor recurrence, vascular diseases (e.g., stroke, vascular malformations), osmotic demyelination syndrome, infectious rhomboencephalitis associated with Listeria monocytogenes, Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis, or even primary brainstem gliomas.In the case of our patient, the final diagnosis was based on the clinical and imaging findings and the previous history of radiotherapy, after excluding all other possible diagnoses.Normal serum sodium levels and negative Listeria antibodies excluded the possibility of osmotic demyelination syndrome and rhomboencephalitis, respectively.Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis was rather unlikely due to the lack of headache, drowsiness, and flaccid paralysis, which are key features in its clinical presentation.Considering the previous history of radiotherapy, radionecrosis was the most possible scenario.Radiation necrosis can also produce variable and nonspecific clinical symptoms associated with a mass

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicHead and Neck Surgical OncologyFrench-language works237,207