Genomic and transcriptomic signals of thermal tolerance in heat-tolerant corals ( <i>Platygyra daedalea</i> ) of the Arabian/Persian Gulf
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Scleractinian corals occur in tropical regions near their upper thermal limits, and are severely threatened by rising ocean temperatures. Ocean warming leads to loss of symbiotic algae ( Symbiodinium ), reduced fitness for the coral host, and degradation of the reef. However, several recent studies have shown that natural populations of corals harbor genetic variation in thermal tolerance that may support adaptive responses to warming. Here we’ve extended these approaches to study heat tolerance of corals in the Persian/Arabian Gulf, where heat-tolerant local populations have adapted to warm summer temperatures (>36°C). To evaluate whether selection has depleted genetic variation in thermal tolerance, estimate the potential for future adaptive responses, and understand the functional basis for these corals’ unusual heat tolerance, we measured thermal tolerance using controlled crosses in the Gulf coral Platygyra daedalea . We found that heat tolerance is highly heritable in this population (0.487-0.748), suggesting substantial potential for adaptive responses to selection for thermal tolerance. To identify genetic markers associated with this variation, we conducted genomewide SNP genotyping in parental corals and tested for relationships between paternal genotype and thermal tolerance of the offspring. We found that multilocus SNP genotypes explained a large fraction of variation in thermal tolerance in these crosses (69%). To investigate the functional basis of these differences in thermal tolerance, we profiled transcriptional responses in tolerant and susceptible families, revealing substantial sire effects on transcriptional responses to thermal stress. We also studied sequence variation in these expressed sequences, identifying alleles and functional groups associated with thermal tolerance. Our findings demonstrate that corals in these populations harbor extensive genetic variation in thermal tolerance, and these heat-tolerant phenotypes differ in both gene sequences and transcriptional stress responses from their susceptible counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".