Experience with High Dose Once-daily Vancomycin for Patients with Skin and Soft-tissue infections in an Ambulatory Setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Intravenous (IV) vancomycin is commonly used to treat MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) infections and is typically dosed at 15 mg/kg every 12 hours. Pharmacokinetic studies, animal models, and limited human study suggest that once-daily high dose (30 mg/kg) vancomycin is similar in efficacy for certain types of infection in the hospital setting, but there is little evidence for its use in outpatient antibiotic therapy (OPAT). We have used a high dose vancomycin regimen for MRSA skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI) since 2011. We describe our experience with this regimen in an ambulatory setting supervised by Infectious Diseases (ID) physicians and evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods This retrospective observational study included patients treated with vancomycin for SSTI from Jan 1, 2014 to July 31, 2015. Exclusion criteria included noncompliance with treatment. Patients with initial renal impairment were also excluded as they would be given 15 mg/kg vancomycin daily. Patient demographics, response to vancomycin, duration of therapy, readmission to emergency department (ER), and side effects experienced by patients were collected. A successful outcome was defined as no further requirement for IV vancomycin on the last day of therapy with either oral step down therapy or no further antibiotic. Results 407 charts were reviewed and 208 patients qualified for inclusion. The mean age of included patients was 38 years. Of the 208 patients, 31% were people who inject drugs, 39% had preceding SSTI in the 12 months prior, and 48% had been on antibiotics in the previous 8 weeks. Incision and drainage was done in 50% of the patients. There were 135 positive wound cultures, of which 58% grew MRSA. The average duration of treatment was 4.7 days. A successful outcome was achieved in 162 patients (79%). Side effects including red man syndrome and phlebitis were seen in 19 patients (9.3%). 42 patients (20.5%) were readmitted to ER within 30 days of initial referral, and 18 of those were related to the original infections. Conclusion High dose (30 mg/kg) once-daily vancomycin for SSTI was effective and safe when used for select patients under the supervision of ID physicians in an ambulatory setting. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".