Validation of the Standardized Universal Pain Evaluations for Rheumatology Providers for Children and Youth (SUPER-KIDZ)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study Design Longitudinal observational clinimetric study with repeated measures. Background No validated multidimensional pain measure for children and youth with juvenile idiopathic arthritis exists. Objective To determine the test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of English and French versions of the Standardized Universal Pain Evaluations for Rheumatology Providers for Children and Youth (SUPER-KIDZ). Methods Measurement properties of the SUPER-KIDZ (older child, younger child, and parent versions) were prospectively evaluated in patients (aged 4 to 18 years) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis at 2 centers. Internal consistency of the 3 subscales was measured using ordinal reliability alpha. Test-retest reliability for each subscale was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) from participants assumed to have stable pain (over a 1-week period with no change in treatment). Correlations of SUPER-KIDZ scores with validated measures determined construct validity. Responsiveness of SUPER-KIDZ subscales was evaluated in patients with improvement in pain, using standardized response mean and linear mixed-model regression. Results Seventy-one children aged 8 to 18 years and 29 parent-child dyads aged 4 to 7 years were included. Seventy-four percent of participants were female, with a median of 3 active joints (interquartile range, 1-5). Internal consistency was strong (α = .78-.96) for pain characteristics, interference, and emotional functioning SUPER-KIDZ subscales. Good test-retest reliability (ICC≥0.80) was found for the pain characteristics subscale in older- and younger-child versions. Most other subscales had satisfactory reliability coefficients (ICC≥0.70). Correlations of 0.50 or greater were found between the older-child SUPER-KIDZ scores and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depressive symptoms items, as well as the younger-child pain-intensity item and the Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Strong responsiveness was found for all subscales (standardized response mean, 0.63-1.54; significant linear mixed-model regression), except for the older-child emotional functioning subscale. Conclusion The SUPER-KIDZ has shown good internal consistency and responsiveness, and satisfactory test-retest reliability. Construct validity was moderate for the younger- and older-child versions, but weak for the parent version. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(10):731-740. Epub 4 Sep 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7375.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.027 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".