MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753374802 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1594

Molecular Detection of Enteropathogens from Diarrheic Stool of HIV-positive Patients in Gondar, Ethiopia

2017· article· en· W2753374802 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lubaba Seid, William Stokes, Abebe Genetu Bayih, Habtie Tesfa, Dylan R. Pillai

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)DiarrheaVirologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infectious diarrhea is a common problem in the developing world, especially among people living with HIV/AIDS. Traditional diagnostic methods such as stool culture and microscopic examination is limited by resources. The use of molecular diagnostics for enteropathogen detection in this region of sub-Saharan Africa has not been fully explored. To identify risk factors and characterize enteropathogens from diarrheic stools of HIV positive patients in Gondar, Ethiopia using multiplex molecular panels targeting key infectious agents. A cross-sectional study of 100 stool samples was performed. Samples were collected consecutively from HIV positive patients presenting with diarrhea at a local clinic in Gondar, a major center in NW Ethiopia. Genomic DNA was extracted from stool and processed in Canada using multiplex molecular panels (Allplex [Seegene Canada] and FilmArray [Biomerieux]). Correlations between patient characteristics, symptoms, public health risk factors and enteropathogen type(s) was explored using STATA (Version 14.1). Ninety-four samples were successfully analyzed by molecular methods. Six samples were excluded due to insufficient volumes. The mean age was 35 with 43% male, 17% living in a rural area, 24% with access only to well water and 74% practicing proper hand hygiene. The majority of patients (68%) were receiving HAART with 32% having CD4 counts greater than 500/µL. Multiple pathogens were detected in 95% of specimens, with 62% having 5 or more enteropathogens. Common bacteria, viruses and parasites detected were Shigella spp./enteroinvasive E. coli (80%), enterotoxigenic E. coli (72%), Norovirus (15%) and C. Parvum (8%). CD4 cell counts and use of HAART were not associated with type or number of enteropathogens detected, though the number of patients with CD4<200/µl was small (23%). Diarrheic stool from HIV-positive outpatients in Gondar, Ethiopia had on average 5 enteropathogens present in their stool. CD4 count was not predictive of pathogen type or number in this study. Shigella spp./enteroinvasive E. coli and enterotoxigenic E. coli are the major pathogens, not dissimilar to immunocompetent individuals in low income countries. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter ResearchFrench-language works237,207