MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753443932 · doi:10.3389/fnana.2017.00073

Affective Circuitry Alterations in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia

2017· article· en· W2753443932 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroanatomy · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCingulum (brain)FornixWhite matterFractional anisotropyMedial forebrain bundleDiffusion MRICingulate cortexNeuroscienceTractographyPsychologyAnatomyMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingHippocampusCentral nervous systemRadiologyStriatum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe chronic neuropathic facial pain disorder. Affect-related behavioural and structural brain changes have been noted across chronic pain disorders, but have not been well-studied in TN. We examined the potential impact of TN (37 patients: 23 with right-sided TN, 14 with left-sided TN), compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls, on three major white matter tracts responsible for carrying affect-related signals – i.e. cingulum, fornix, and medial forebrain bundle. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI), deterministic mutli-tensor tractography for tract modelling, and a model-driven region-of-interest approach was used. We also used volumetric grey matter analysis on key targets of these pathways (i.e. hippocampus, cingulate cortex subregions, nucleus accumbens and ventral diencephalon). Hypotheses included: 1) successful modelling of tracts; 2) altered white matter microstructure of the cingulum and medial forebrain bundle (via changes in dMRI metrics such as fractional anisotropy, and mean, axial and radial diffusivities) compared to controls; 3) no alterations in the control region of the fornix; 4) corresponding decreases in grey matter volumes. Results showed 1) all 325 tracts were successfully modelled, although 11 were partially complete; 2) The cingulum and medial forebrain bundle (MFB) were altered in those with TN, with dMRI metric changes in the middle (p=0.001) and posterior cingulum (p<0.0001), and the MFB near the ventral tegmental area (MFB-VTA) (p=0.001). The posterior cingulum and MFB-VTA also showed unilateral differences between right- and left-sided TN patients; 3) No differences were noted at any fornix subdivision; 4) decreased volumes were noted for the hippocampus, posterior cingulate, nucleus accumbens, and ventral diencephalon. Together, these results support the notion of selectively altered affective circuits in patients with TN, which may be related to the experience of negative affect and the increased comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it