General Formalism of Vibronic Hamiltonians for Tetrahedral and Octahedral Systems: Problems That Involve <i>T</i>, <i>E</i> States and <i>t</i>, <i>e</i> Vibrations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We derive expansion formulas up to arbitrary order in vibrational coordinates for the tetrahedral and octahedral vibronic Hamiltonians that involve T and E states, and t and e vibrations. These states feature both Jahn–Teller (JT) and pseudo-Jahn–Teller (pJT) effects, and the vibrations are the most JT and pJT active. We first derive the formulas for 92 problems of T and T d symmetries involving up to two vibrational modes. The formulas can be easily generalized to problems of T h, O, and O h symmetries, as well as problems involving more than two vibrational modes. They can also be adapted to describe spin–orbit vibronic Hamiltonians of tetrahedral p-type problems. Overall, this work makes crucial preparations for future studies on vibronic coupling problems of tetrahedral and octahedral systems. Most importantly, a new, simple, modularized approach to construct vibronic Hamiltonians for a set of related problems, instead of particular problems one by one, is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".