Ustekinumab use in Crohn’s disease: a Canadian tertiary care centre experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Real world data regarding clinical response to ustekinumab in Crohn's disease is lacking. We report our experience of ustekinumab use using a novel subcutaneous (SC) induction strategy and aim to identify predictors of response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of compassionate ustekinumab use in Crohn's disease was conducted with the use of a standard or high dose SC induction protocol. Symptomatic response was assessed after 3 months (short-term), and if remaining on therapy, within 3-12 months (medium-term) and at least 12 months (long-term). Endoscopic or radiologic response was assessed when available. Survival analysis of time to failure (cessation of ustekinumab) and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of response were performed. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients commenced ustekinumab, with six patients lost to follow-up and five asymptomatic at baseline. Symptomatic response was assessed in 68 patients; 56% (38) of patients had a short-term symptomatic response. Type of preceding anti-TNF response was the only significant predictor of short-term response, with primary non-response being a strong predictor. In the medium-term, symptomatic response occurred in 72% (30/42) of patients and endoscopic or radiologic response was achieved in 72% (26/36) of patients assessed. The median time to failure was 22 months. Maintenance dose escalation to 90 mg every 4 weeks was successful in three of 16 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty-six percent of patients had short-term symptomatic response, with a history of primary non-response to prior anti-TNF therapy being a predictor of response. Dose escalation had only modest benefit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".