Field measurements of overlap reductions for two reinforced fabric-encased geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) reported to have experienced significant shrinkage at other locations are examined on both a 3H:1V south-facing slope and a relatively flat base on a silty sand. The GCLs were overlapped by 300 mm with 400 g/m of supplemental bentonite and covered by a black 1.5 mm high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane to form a composite liner that was left exposed in a full-scale field test embankment for a period of almost 5 years. It is shown that despite the relatively uniform exposure conditions, shrinkage is highly variable with a maximum shrinkage of GCL A being 165 mm on the slope and 415 mm on the base while GCL B shrunk by up to 75 mm on the side slope and only up to 25 mm on the base. The dominant role played by variable overlap stick and heterogeneity to the locations where the overlaps are re-wetted are discussed. Based on this study of shrinkage and a related study of downslope erosion at the same site, it is concluded that neither GCLs A nor B should be left in exposed composite liners when they can be subjected to thermal cycles that can lead to hydration and dehydration of the GCL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".