MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The CCTG PA.7 trial: A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel vs. gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, durvalumab, and tremelimumab as 1<sup>st</sup> line therapy in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

2017· article· en· W2754251024 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel J. Renouf, Petr Kavan, Neesha C. Dhani, Derek J. Jonker, Alice C. Wei, Tina Hsu, Patricia A. Tang, Barbara Graham, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher J. O’Callaghan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityBaker Hughes (Canada)University of OttawaOttawa HospitalBC Cancer AgencyPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGemcitabineDurvalumabTremelimumabInternal medicineOncologyPaclitaxelImmunogenicityCancerImmunotherapyAntigenImmunologyNivolumabIpilimumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS4149 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) and Nab-Paclitaxel (Nab-P) has become a standard 1st line therapy for advanced PDAC based on the MPACT Trial.Durvalumab (D) is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that inhibits binding of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to its receptor (PD-1). Tremelimumab (T) is a mAb directed against the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). Monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has thus far demonstrated limited activity in PDAC. This may be partly related to the activity of cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) in promoting an immunosuppressive tumoural microenvironment in PDAC. GEM and Nab-P treatment may deplete stroma and CAFs, release neo-antigens and increase the immunogenicity of PDAC. This study is designed to evaluate whether the addition of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibition to GEM/Nab-P increases treatment efficacy. Methods: This randomized phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02879318) will assess the efficacy and safety of GEM/Nab-P vs. GEM/Nab-P/D/T in patients (pts) with metastatic PDAC (n = 190). Good performance status pts (ECOG < 2) with untreated metastatic PDAC will be eligible. Prior adjuvant therapy is allowed provided recurrence is > 6 months post-completion. There is a safety lead in of 10 pts receiving GEM/Nab-P/D/T. Assuming no safety concerns the study will go on to randomize pts in a 2:1 ratio to receive GEM (1000mg/m2 D1, 8, 15)/Nab-P (125mg/m2 D1, 8, 15) with/without D (1500 mg) D1 q 28 days and T (75 mg) D1 for first 4 cycles. Treatment will continue until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision to stop. Primary endpoint is overall survival; secondary endpoints include progression free survival, safety, overall response rate and quality of life. Analysis will be according to randomized group stratified by ECOG PS and receipt of prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Blood, plasma, and archival tissue will be collected and assessed for potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers. As of February 1 2017, 11 pts have been enrolled and the initial safety analysis is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02879318.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research→French-language works237,207→