MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754684127 · doi:10.1177/2049463717730433

Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves of knee for relief of intractable pain from knee osteoarthritis: a case series

2017· article· en· W2754684127 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arif Ahmed, Divesh Arora

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pain · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisWOMACRadiofrequency ablationKnee painOxford knee scoreSurgeryKnee JointUltrasoundPhysical therapyAblationRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The knee arthroplasty is the best option for patients with advanced osteoarthritis who have failed all other conservative options, but regrettably many patients fail to undergo surgery due to co-morbidities or other reasons. So, new alternative modes are always in demand for these patients. METHODS: The ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of all the genicular nerves of knee joint was done in patients with grade III and IV osteoarthritis of knee joint, with severe pain (numerical rating scale (NRS) > 7) who had failed conservative management and intra-articular injections after a positive genicular nerve block with local anaesthetics. The demographics, pain intensity measured in NRS, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and quality of life measured by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire was measured at baseline and at regular intervals. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 61.50 ± 6.75 years. There was significant improvement in pain intensity at rest, movement and on weight bearing from 8.75 ± 0.5, 9.0 ± 0.0, and 9.0 ± 0.0 at baseline to 2.38 ± 0.51, 3.75 ± 0.46, and 4.13 ± 0.35 at 1 month and 3.13 ± 0.64, 4.38 ± 0.51, and 4.63 ± 0.51 at 6 months after the procedure, respectively (p value <0.05). The OKS had improved from 7.75 ± 1.25 at baseline to 28.88 ± 2.53 and 28.13 ± 1.80 at 1 and 6 months, respectively, after the procedure (p value <0.05). The WOMAC score had also improved significantly from 77.75 ± 4.34 at baseline to 38.38 ± 5.82 and 39.25 ± 5.12 at 1 and 6 months, respectively (p value <0.05). There was also significant improvement in the quality of life after the procedure (p value <0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided RFA of genicular nerves of knee joint is a good alternative option for patients who are having severe pain and disability from knee osteoarthritis and gives a long-lasting pain relief for more than 6 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PainSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207