Facilitators and Barriers to Positive Airway Pressure Adherence for Adolescents. A Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Low adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for adolescents with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can have long-term cardiometabolic and developmental impact. OBJECTIVES: To explore the facilitators and barriers to PAP use in adolescents with OSA. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using a descriptive thematic analysis approach. A total of 21 interviews were conducted in the clinical setting with adolescents prescribed PAP to treat OSA within the previous 12 months. Interview audio recordings were transcribed verbatim for analysis. Transcripts were reviewed, and data were categorized using a coding framework developed by the research team. Codes were structured into themes related to the barriers and facilitators to using PAP. RESULTS: Participants described numerous challenges with the physical design of the PAP machine, including the restriction of the tubing, the discomfort of the mask, and concerns with its size and weight. A period of adjustment to wearing and preparing the PAP machine was described whereby participants had to develop their own strategies to improve comfort. After initiating the therapy, the challenges experienced by participants were cited more often than the perceived benefits, particularly for those who were less adherent. Finally, the unique needs of adolescents were highlighted, which impacted the amount of family support desired in using PAP. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies factors affecting PAP adherence when prescribed in adolescence and highlights the need for ongoing dialogue between adolescents and their clinical team with respect to challenges encountered, troubleshooting, adherence strategies, and parental engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".