Extracranial internal carotid artery vasospasm during thrombectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of a stent retriever increases the risk of intracranial vasospasm. Here, we report the case of a man who developed severe vasospasm in a long segment of the extracranial internal carotid artery after mechanical irritation by a stent retriever inserted for the treatment of acute cerebral ischemia. A 47-year-old right-handed man presented with sudden-onset right-sided weakness and difficulty speaking. The patient's National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 and he had an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score of 9. The patient was started on intravenous alteplase therapy, and an acute thrombectomy was performed. Left internal carotid digital subtraction angiography showed narrowing of the left common and internal carotid arteries and occlusion of the proximal left M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery. A stent retriever was retracted into a guiding catheter placed at the left carotid bulb under continuous suction. Recanalization of the middle cerebral artery was not achieved and there was significant narrowing in a long segment of the extracranial internal carotid artery associated with exacerbation of the patient's aphasia. The cervical vasospasm improved after nicardipine infusion via the catheter. We encountered vasospasm in a long segment of the extracranial internal carotid artery after mechanical irritation by a stent retriever. If a stent retriever is used in a patient with a narrow extracranial internal carotid artery, consideration should be given to using a Penumbra or smaller guiding catheter located in the distal internal carotid artery to prevent irritation to the cervical vessel wall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".