La Détention Des Mineurs Étrangers Non Accompagnés Dans Le Contexte De L’immigration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans plusieurs pays à travers le monde certaines autorités gouvernementales arrêtent des mineurs étrangers non accompagnés et les détiennent dans des centres fermés. En général leur détention n’est pas relative à une infraction pénale, mais au manque de documents règlementaires requis qui rendraient possible leur entrée légale dans le pays. Il est particulièrement important que les États membres à la Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant reconnaissent aux mineurs étrangers non accompagnés le droit d’être traités avec humanité et avec respect de leur qualité d’enfant, tout en tenant compte de leurs besoins spécifiques. Dans le présent article, nous exposons d’abord les faits d’une affaire célèbre survenue en Belgique concernant la détention d’une mineure étrangère non accompagnée, âgée de cinq ans à l’époque. On constate avec cette affaire que la problématique de la détention des mineurs étrangers non accompagnés est pertinente aussi dans d’autres pays que le Canada. Nous abordons ensuite la norme internationale sur la détention des enfants garantie dans la Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant, le but est d’examiner la conformité à cette norme des dispositions concernant la détention des mineurs contenues dans la Loi sur l’immigration et la protection des réfugiés du Canada. English:In many countries in the world certain governmental authorities arrest unaccompanied foreign minors and detain them in closed centres. Generally it is not because they have committed a criminal offence, but rather that they lack valid administrative papers allowing them to enter the country legally. It is particularly important that State Parties to the Convention on the Rights of the Child recognize that unaccompanied foreign minors have the right to be treated with humanity and as children with specific needs. In this article, we will first recount a famous Belgian case concerning the detention of an unaccompanied foreign minor who was five-years old at the time. This case will highlight that the problem of the detention of unaccompanied foreign minors is relevant to other countries beside Canada. We then explore the international standards with regard to children’s detention established by the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The objective is to examine whether the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Act’s position on detention complies with this norm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".