Long Vertical Distance Bonding of the Hexagonal Boron Nitride Monolayer on the Cu(111) Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) monolayer on the Cu(111) surface has recently been considered an example of an extremely weak hBN/metal interaction, as indicated, e.g., from the presence of an only electronic Moiré-like superstructure that was observed in scanning tunneling microscopy images. From these results, a large bonding distance of the hBN sheet to the topmost Cu layer can be envisaged but has not been proven so far. We report a structural analysis of the hBN/Cu(111) interface based on high resolution low energy electron diffraction and normal incidence X-ray standing wave experiments. We find that both the boron and nitrogen atoms are located at very large vertical distances of d B = 3.25 ± 0.02 Å and d N = 3.22 ± 0.03 Å with respect to the nominal position of the topmost Cu(111) layer. Significant vertical buckling and lateral distortions of the hBN layer can be excluded. These results demonstrate that the hBN monolayer on the Cu(111) surface is indeed well described by a rigid and geometrically well separated sheet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".