Reactivity of Cyclic Silenolates Revisited
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stable exocyclic silenolates 2a – c ( 2a, R = Mes; 2b, R = o -Tol; 2c, R = 1-Ad) were fully characterized by NMR and UV–vis spectroscopy. According to spectroscopic and structural features, 2a – c are best described as acyl silyl anions (tautomeric structure I) in solution. This behavior is also reflected by the reaction of 2a, c with MeI. Both alkylation reactions take place at the corresponding silicon atom and lead to the formation of the methylated structures 4a, b in nearly quantitative yields. Furthermore, the thermal stability of exocyclic silenolates 2a, c was investigated. In the case of 2a, a thermally induced intramolecular sila-Peterson alkenation was observed at 60 °C. This transformation allowed straightforward access to 2-oxahexasilabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-ide 5 as a structurally complex, bicyclic silicon framework. In contrast to that, heating of 2c, as an example of an alkyl-substituted silenolate, led to an unexpected degradation to uncharacterized polymers. However, we were able to isolate the 1-adamantyl-substituted, bicyclic compound 8, which is structurally closely related to 5, by the treatment of 1,4-dipotassium-1,4-bis(trimethylsilyl)cyclohexasilane with 1 equiv of 1-adamantoyl chloride. Again an intramolecular sila-Peterson alkenation is responsible for the formation of 8 . The mechanism for this highly selective reaction sequence is outlined and supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which highlight the thermodynamic driving force and the low activation barriers of this multistep transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".