Scheduling Recurring Distributed Dataflow Jobs Based on Resource Utilization and Interference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resource management systems like YARN or Mesos enable users to share cluster infrastructures by running analytics jobs in temporarily reserved containers. These containers are typically not isolated to achieve high degrees of overall resource utilizations despite the often fluctuating resource usage of single analytic jobs. However, some combinations of jobs utilize the resources better and interfere less with each others when running on the same nodes than others. This paper presents an approach for improving the resource utilization and job throughput when scheduling recurring data analysis jobs in shared cluster environments. Using a reinforcement learning algorithm, the scheduler continuously learns which jobs are best executed simultaneously on the cluster. Our evaluation of an implementation built on Hadoop YARN shows that this approach can increase resource utilization and decrease job runtimes. While interference between jobs can be avoided, co-locations of jobs with complementary resource usage are not yet always fully recognized. However, with a better measure of co-location goodness, our solution can be used to automatically adapt the scheduling to workloads with recurring batch jobs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".