MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755888027 · doi:10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.wmp93

Abstract WMP93: Cortical Superficial Siderosis in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Higher Prevalence Among Convexity Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Than Among Intracerebral Hemorrhage

2016· article· en· W2755888027 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Raposo, Lionel Calvière, Vanessa Cazzola, Sofia Pastoura, Jean François Albucher, Jean‐Bernard Ruidavets, Jean‐Marc Olivot, François Chollet, Vincent Larrue, Christophe Cognard, Fabrice Bonneville, Alain Viguier

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsCollège Lionel Groulx
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperficial siderosisMedicineCerebral amyloid angiopathyIntracerebral hemorrhageSubarachnoid hemorrhageSiderosisInternal medicineDementiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a major cause of both lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and cerebral microbleeds (CMB), especially in the elderly. Recently, acute convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS) has been identified as markers of CAA. Although the clinical feature and the increased risk of future lobar ICH of cSS is well established, little is known about the specific pattern of CAA-related cSAH. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that clinical and imaging characteristics of CAA-related cSAH differ from CAA-related lobar ICH. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and MRI data of a monocentric cohort of 45 consecutive patients with an acute cSAH related to probable CAA and a comparison group of 70 consecutive patients presenting with an acute lobar ICH meeting Boston criteria for probable CAA. Results: cSAH patients were younger than ICH patients (mean age +/-SD: 75 +/-7 vs 78 +/-7; p=0.046). Transient focal neurological episodes (TFNE) were common among cSAH patients (84.4% vs 0%; p<0.001). Persistent focal neurological deficits were frequent among ICH patients (15.6% vs 98.6%; p<0.001). Prevalence of cSS was significantly higher among cSAH patients than among ICH patients (88.9% vs 60%; p<0.001) especially disseminated (66.7% vs 37.1%; p=0.002) and bilateral cSS (48.9% vs 28.6%; p=0.027). Number of lobar macrobleeds (median number [IQR]: 0 [0-1] vs 1[1-2]; p=0.07) and lobar CMB (median number [IQR]: 3 [1-6] vs 6 [2-14.75]; p=0.405) did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: In CAA, patients presenting with cSAH are characterized by a younger age, TFNE as presenting symptoms and a higher prevalence of cSS than those presenting with Lobar ICH. These findings suggest that restricted hemorrhage into the subarachnoid space may play a crucial role in cSS physiopathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207