MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756108498 · doi:10.1109/compsac.2017.163

LXC Container Migration in Cloudlets under Multipath TCP

2017· article· en· W2756108498 on OpenAlexaff
Yuqing Qiu, Chung–Horng Lung, Samuel A. Ajila, Pradeep Srivastava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloudletMultipath TCPComputer scienceComputer networkServerLive migrationTestbedCloud computingProvisioningQuality of experienceEdge computingVirtualizationQuality of serviceOperating systemMultipath propagation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing popularity of mobile devices and Internet of Things (IoT) has inspired the advent of the Cloudlet concept-a "small data center" close to users at the edge. It is believed that the Quality of Experience (QoE) of end users would greatly improve if they can access required resources within a one-hop distance from Cloudlet servers. Over the years, many researchers have proposed using virtual machines (VMs) as such service-provisioning servers. However, seeing the potentiality of containers-a lightweight virtualization tool, this paper adopts LXC containers as Cloudlet platforms. To facilitate container migration between Cloudlets, CRIU (Checkpoint/Restore in Userspace) has been chosen as the migration tool. Since the migration process goes through the Wide Area Network (WAN), which may experience congestion or network failures, this paper adopts the MPTCP (Multipath TCP) protocol to address the challenge. The multiple subflows established within a MPTCP connection can improve the resilience of the migration process and reduce migration time. We have conducted a number of experiments to validate the proposed approach. The experimental results show that LXC containers are suitable candidates for the problem and MPTCP protocol is effective in enhancing the migration process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207