MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756178523 · doi:10.1161/hyp.70.suppl_1.p397

Abstract P397: Living in Ethnic-enclave Neighborhoods May Attenuate the Negative Effect of Acculturation on Blood Pressure in Refugees and Maintain Immigrant Health Effect

2017· article· en· W2756178523 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Dalmar, Douglas J. Pryce, Brian C. Martinson, Farhiya Faraha, Sandra Wewerka, Diana K. DuBois, Laura Sanka, Osman Ahmed, Bjorn Westgard

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsDalsa Corporation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomaliAcculturationMedicineRefugeeDemographyEthnic groupImmigrationBlood pressurePopulationResidenceGerontologyLogistic regressionCross-sectional studyInternal medicineEnvironmental healthGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Researchers have long hypothesized that acculturation (duration of U.S. residence [DOR]) is associated with increases in blood pressure in immigrant populations. However, little is known about the potential effects of acculturation on hypertension (HTN) in refugees living in ethnic-enclave neighborhoods. We conducted a cross-sectional study of Somali refugees and immigrants (a largely enclaved population) living in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Method: We analyzed data from 1155 Somali refugees/immigrants who arrived in United States from 1990 to 2015 and are participating in an ongoing study of Somali refugees in the Twin Cities. Using 10 years as a threshold, the study population was divided into two groups based on DOR: short (< 10 years) or long (>= 10 years). Main outcome was HTN, which was defined using the protocol of international HTN studies. Differences between the two groups were determined by chi-squared test and t-test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine association between HTN and DOR. Results: Of 1155 subjects, 572 (49.6%) had DOR >= 10 years. Mean DOR was 9.8 ± 6.0 years (median of 10), and 58.1% (559 of 1155) were women. The short DOR group was younger (mean age 44.6 ± 18.0 vs 51.4 ± 18.1 years, P< 0.001. There was no difference in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) between groups (117 mmHg vs 119 mmHg, P=0.087) and no correlation between SBP and DOR (linear R 2 =0.012). Prevalence of HTN was 29.5% (341 of 1155), with 179 of these 341 (52.5%) having uncontrolled HTN. HTN increased with aging: 4.1% (19 of 457) for age group 18-39, 15.3% (47 of 306) for ages 40-59, and 29.7% (114 of 384) for ages 60 + . After adjusting for body mass index, marital status, English language (written and spoken), health insurance, income / poverty ratio, language spoken at home, employment, education and DOR, age was the only predicator of HTN. Even after matching two groups by age, the distribution of HTN was similar between the two age-matched DOR groups (P=0.1879). Conclusions: DOR (acculturation) was not a predictor of HTN in this highly enclaved refugee/immigrant sample. Further studies are needed to identify which cultural and neighborhood environment factors may operate to blunt the effects of acculturation on blood pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207