MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756228641 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.925

In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates Collected from Urinary Track Source: SIDERO-WT-2014/SIDERO-WT-2015

2017· article· en· W2756228641 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masakatsu Tsuji, Meredith Hackel, Roger Echols, Yoshinori Yamano, Dan Sahm

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColistinStenotrophomonas maltophiliaMicrobiologyAcinetobacter baumanniiCephalosporinBroth microdilutionPseudomonas aeruginosaCefepimeCarbapenemEnterobacteriaceaeCeftazidime/avibactamAcinetobacterMedicineBiologyCeftazidimeMinimum inhibitory concentrationBacteriaAntibioticsImipenemAntibiotic resistanceEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The global rise of carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting bacteria is alarming and become threats to patient as only a few drugs remain active (e.g. colistin). Cefiderocol (S-649266) is a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with potent activity against a wide variety of Gram-negative pathogens including carbapenem-resistant strains. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparator agents against clinical isolates collected from urinary track source from North America. Methods A total of 3,323 Enterobacteriaceae, 263 Acinetobacter spp, 509 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 38 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia collected from the USA and Canada in 2014–2016 were tested. MIC was determined for cefiderocol, cefepime (FEP), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), ciprofloxacin (CIP), colistin (CST), and meropenem (MEM) by broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI 2016 guidelines. All testing was done at IHMA, Inc. As recommended by CLSI, cefiderocol was tested in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth. Based upon CLSI breakpoints, carbapenem-non-susceptible (CarbNS) strains were defined as follows: MEM: MIC ≥2 µg/mL for Enterobacteriaceae, ≥4 µg/mL for non-fermenters. Quality control testing was performed on each day of testing by using E. coli ATCC25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC27853. Results Cefiderocol exhibited in vitro activity against 4,133 strains of Gram-negative bacteria with an overall MIC90 of 0.5 µg/mL. At 4 µg/mL cefiderocol inhibited the growth of 99.9% of the all isolates. MIC90 of cefiderocol against CarbNS Enterobacteriaceae was 4 µg/mL although MIC90 of other comparators were >64 or >8 (CST) µg/mL. The cefiderocol MIC90value was 1 µg/mL for CarbNS non-fermeneters. Conclusion Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and S. maltophilia isolates collected from a UTI source, with greater than 99.9% of isolates having MIC values ≤4 µg/mL. These findings indicate that this agent has high potential for treating cUTI infections caused by these problematic organisms, including isolates resistant to colistin. Disclosures M. Tsuji, Shionogi & Co.: Employee, Salary; M. Hackel, IHMA: Employee, Salary; R. Echols, Shionogi & CO., LTD: Consultant, Consulting fee; Y. Yamano, Shionogi & Co.: Employee, Salary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207