On the Capacity and the Optimal Sum-Rate of a Class of Dual-Band Interference Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study a class of two-transmitter two-receiver dual-band Gaussian interference channels (GIC) which operates over the conventional microwave and the unconventional millimeter-wave (mm-wave) bands. This study is motivated by future 5G networks where additional spectrum in the mm-wave band complements transmission in the incumbent microwave band. The mm-wave band has a key modeling feature: due to severe path loss and relatively small wavelength, a transmitter must employ highly directional antenna arrays to reach its desired receiver. This feature causes the mm-wave channels to become highly directional, and thus can be used by a transmitter to transmit to its designated receiver or the other receiver. We consider two classes of such channels, where the underlying GIC in the microwave band has weak and strong interference, and obtain sufficient channel conditions under which the capacity is characterized. Moreover, we assess the impact of the additional mm-wave band spectrum on the performance, by characterizing the transmit power allocation for the direct and cross channels that maximizes the sum-rate of this dual-band channel. The solution reveals conditions under which different power allocations, such as allocating the power budget only to direct or only to cross channels, or sharing it among them, becomes optimal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".